This is the demo portfolio. Nothing here is real, and nothing can be saved.

Portfolio

Harebell Cottage

Regulation 44 visit, 4 July 2026

Submitted to OfstedAnnouncedSCCIF (children's homes), April 2026Submitted 7 July 2026

Opinion

Are children effectively safeguarded?
Safeguarding records reviewed in full; concerns were escalated appropriately and in time.
Yes
Does the conduct of the home promote children's wellbeing?
Children report feeling settled and listened to; staff know them well.
Yes

The visit

Spoke with EL and with staff NS, SW, LP. Sampled the case files of EL. Reviewed 10 areas: physical intervention and restraint, missing from home episodes, complaints, sanctions and consequences, safeguarding concerns and referrals, regulation 40 notifications, children's views, staff supervision, key-work and one-to-one sessions, online safety.

Findings

0 concerns, 4 strengths. Every finding records what was looked at, what was found, and why it matters.

  • Physical intervention and restraint

    Strength
    Looked at
    All physical intervention records since the last visit; debrief forms.
    Found
    All records include a debrief with the child within 24 hours.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Missing from home episodes

    Strength
    Looked at
    Missing episode log; return-home interview records; police notifications.
    Found
    Return-home interviews offered and recorded for every episode.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Complaints

    Strength
    Looked at
    Complaints log and responses.
    Found
    Complaints responded to within policy timescale; outcomes explained to children.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Staff supervision

    Strength
    Looked at
    Supervision records for four staff selected at random.
    Found
    Supervision at monthly frequency for all staff sampled.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.