This is the demo portfolio. Nothing here is real, and nothing can be saved.

Portfolio

Yarrow House

Regulation 44 visit, 5 November 2025

Submitted to OfstedUnannouncedSCCIF (children's homes), April 2026Submitted 8 November 2025

Opinion

Are children effectively safeguarded?
Safeguarding records reviewed in full; concerns were escalated appropriately and in time.
Yes
Does the conduct of the home promote children's wellbeing?
Children report feeling settled and listened to; staff know them well.
Yes

The visit

Spoke with LW, DR, SE, FC and with staff MA, BW, WE. Sampled the case files of LW. Reviewed 11 areas: physical intervention and restraint, missing from home episodes, complaints, safeguarding concerns and referrals, regulation 40 notifications, children's views, education attendance and progress, staff supervision, fire safety, health and safety checks, children's meetings.

Findings

0 concerns, 6 strengths. Every finding records what was looked at, what was found, and why it matters.

  • Physical intervention and restraint

    Strength
    Looked at
    All physical intervention records since the last visit; debrief forms.
    Found
    All records include a debrief with the child within 24 hours.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Missing from home episodes

    Strength
    Looked at
    Missing episode log; return-home interview records; police notifications.
    Found
    Return-home interviews offered and recorded for every episode.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Complaints

    Strength
    Looked at
    Complaints log and responses.
    Found
    Complaints responded to within policy timescale; outcomes explained to children.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Education attendance and progress

    Strength
    Looked at
    Attendance registers; PEPs; correspondence with school.
    Found
    All children in full-time provision with attendance above 90%.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Staff supervision

    Strength
    Looked at
    Supervision records for four staff selected at random.
    Found
    Supervision at monthly frequency for all staff sampled.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Fire safety

    Strength
    Looked at
    Fire log book; drill records; fire risk assessment.
    Found
    Drills recorded monthly; alarm tests weekly.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.