This is the demo portfolio. Nothing here is real, and nothing can be saved.

Portfolio

Foxglove House

Regulation 44 visit, 12 April 2026

Submitted to OfstedUnannouncedSCCIF (children's homes), April 2026Submitted 15 April 2026

Opinion

Are children effectively safeguarded?
Safeguarding records reviewed in full; concerns were escalated appropriately and in time.
Yes
Does the conduct of the home promote children's wellbeing?
Children report feeling settled, but the concerns above are recurring and affect daily life.
Partially

The visit

Spoke with KM and with staff WT, AP. Sampled the case files of KM, BG. Reviewed 13 areas: physical intervention and restraint, missing from home episodes, complaints, sanctions and consequences, safeguarding concerns and referrals, regulation 40 notifications, children's views, individual risk assessments, medication management, education attendance and progress, health appointments and records, key-work and one-to-one sessions, online safety.

Progress against previous recommendations

  • Ensure every physical intervention record is reviewed and signed by the manager within 72 hours

    Raised 15 Dec, due 29 Dec. Owner WL.

    Records attached for review.

    Evidence offered

Findings

2 concerns, 3 strengths. Every finding records what was looked at, what was found, and why it matters.

  • Missing from home episodes

    Concern
    Looked at
    Missing episode log; return-home interview records; police notifications.
    Found
    Pattern of episodes on Friday evenings not yet analysed by the manager.
    Why it matters
    Unanalysed patterns mean risk assessments are not reflecting real behaviour.
    Action
    Raised as a recommendation, tracked on the home’s timeline.
  • Education attendance and progress

    Concern
    Looked at
    Attendance registers; PEPs; correspondence with school.
    Found
    One child attending three days a week; no recorded plan to increase.
    Why it matters
    Reduced attendance narrows the child's options and increases time unsupervised.
    Action
    Raised as a recommendation, tracked on the home’s timeline.
  • Physical intervention and restraint

    Strength
    Looked at
    All physical intervention records since the last visit; debrief forms.
    Found
    All records include a debrief with the child within 24 hours.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Complaints

    Strength
    Looked at
    Complaints log and responses.
    Found
    Complaints responded to within policy timescale; outcomes explained to children.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Medication management

    Strength
    Looked at
    MAR sheets for all children; controlled drug register; stock count.
    Found
    MAR sheets complete; stock reconciles.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.